THE COMMUNICATIVE SPACE OF PERSONALITY FORMATION
Svitlana Mykhalska
Ivan Ohienko National University in Kamianets-Podilskyi
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7435-8791
PDF 59-71 (Українська)

Keywords

personality
communication
measurement
interaction
activity

How to Cite

Mykhalska, S. (2019). THE COMMUNICATIVE SPACE OF PERSONALITY FORMATION. PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 5(12), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2019.5.12.4

Abstract

The article analyses theoretically the communicative space of a personality. The space of communicative phenomena in the psychology of personality means their cognition with the aims to correlate communicative personal features with certain reference points, to locate them in a system of theoretical and methodological coordinates, in order to know more deeply communicative qualities, to reveal their ambiguous essence, and to obtain additional information for scientific objectivity and social practice. By considering the motives for world-image constructing, we cannot avoid the fact that the human communicative nature gives every communicating agent a hope for mutual understanding with other people, when existential sympathy is awoken, so that each person can expect solidarity and support form society, which prevent extreme despair and loneliness. The communicative space of a personality is examined from two points of view: in the cognitive plan, in order to grasp objective evidences of personal being; and also it is important to present a sense of personal being in its reflection, namely, internally reflected relations with other peoples and the sign system of the reality as a whole. The article determines that the need in communications, as an individual’s generalized need, and communicative abilities are manifested at several levels: biological, social-personal and personal-reflexive. The article shows that the natural physical disunity of people, as well as their perceptions about each other can distort a dialogue, so communicators become too distant psychologically. To be a communicator means, in particular, to remain nominally the same person, but to be changed qualitatively, because the unity that we want to create with another person or group of people involves not only the exchange of most diverse values, that is namely communication, but also interactive acts, in particular, anticipation of pleasure, intellectual enjoyment of these contacts. The article proves that a highly cultivated communicative ability means that communications is implemented confidently, not instinctively or coercively, but as an initiation, an act.

PDF 59-71 (Українська)

References

Vasilyuk F.E. (2003). Metodologicheskiy analiz v psihologii [Methodological analysis in psychology]. Moscow: Smyisl. [in Russian]

Leontev A.A. (1996). Pedagogicheskoe obschenie [Pedagogical communication]. Moscow: El-Fa. [in Russian]

Leont'ev A.N. (1977). Dejatel'nost'. Soznanie. Lichnost' [Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow: Politizdat. [in Russian]

Musatov S.O. (2003). Psihologіya pedagogіchnoyi komunіkatsіyi: teoretiko-metodologіchniy analіz [Psychology of pedagogical communication: theoretical and methodological analysis]. Kiyiv-Rіvne: Lіsta–M. [in Ukrainian].

Petrovskiy A.V. (1987). Vozmozhnosti i puti postroeniya obschepsihologicheskoy teorii lichnosti [Possibilities and ways of building a general psychological theory of personality]. Voprosyi psihologii – Psychology Issues. №4. рр. 30-44. [in Russian]

Rezvitskiy I.I. (1984). Lichnost. Individualnost. Obschestvo: Problemyi individualnosti i ee sotsialno-filosofskiy smyisl [Personality. Individuality. Society: Problems of individuality and its socio-philosophical meaning]. Moscow: Politizdat. [in Russian]

Rubinshteyn S.L. (2002). Osnovyi obschey psihologii [Fundamentals of General Psychology]. St. Petersburg: Piter. [in Russian]

Shibutani T. (2002). Sotsialnaya psihologiya [Social Psychology]. Rostov on Don: Feniks. [in Russian]

Tkachenko O.M. (1972). Printsipi і kategorіyi psihologіyi [Principles and categories of psychology]. K.: Vischa shkola. [in Ukrainian].

Festinger L. (2000). Teoriya kognitivnogo dissonansa [Theory of cognitive dissonance]. St. Petersburg: Rech. [in Russian]

Yurevich A.V. (2008). Perspektivyi paradigmalnogo sinteza [Prospects for a paradigmatic synthesis]. Voprosyi psihologii – Psychology Issues. №1. рр. 3-15. [in Russian]

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Articles in the Psychological Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more detailed information, please, fallow the link - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/